Last edited by Vigor
Monday, August 10, 2020 | History

4 edition of Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents found in the catalog.

Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents

Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents

progress on human-centered automation : final report

  • 344 Want to read
  • 36 Currently reading

Published by Ohio State University, Institute for Ergonomics, Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Technical Information Service, distributor in [Columbus, Ohio], [Washington, DC, Springfield, Va .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Aircraft safety,
  • Flight safety,
  • Human performance,
  • Man machine systems,
  • Pilot performance,
  • Human factors engineering,
  • Automatic control,
  • Pilot support systems,
  • Transport aircraft

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesProgress on human-centered automation.
    StatementDavid D. Woods, Nadine B. Sarter.
    Series[NASA contractor report] -- 207061., NASA contractor report -- NASA CR-207061.
    ContributionsSarter, Nadine B., United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
    The Physical Object
    FormatMicroform
    Pagination1 v.
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL17839087M
    OCLC/WorldCa41394934

    “The robots are coming! The robots are coming!” seems like a familiar sentiment as robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning become more ubiquitous in workplace settings. The organisation and operation of aircraft in an airline is a socio-technical system. This can be described using the five ‘M’s model (Harris and Harris, ; see Fig. ).The operation of a commercial airliner is not just about the union of pilot (huMan) and aircraft (Machine) to perform a flight (or Mission) within the constraints imposed by the context of the physical environment Cited by: 1.

    itslearning, Washington Street, Suite , Newton, MA | T: () An exploration of the technical and engineering aspects of automated production systems. This book covers all of the modern automation technologies used in production - including the necessary components and subsystems for implementing computer integrated manufacturing in the automated factory of the future.

    If you have not read my first book, i suggest you do, it will make more since!:) Link to the first one- Has it always been you? (A Stiles Stilinski love story) I do not own Teen Wolf, it would be so cool if I did but I don't. I also do not own any of the picture's. I only own Sadie McCall and most of what she says.   Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to Intelligent and Cognitive Automation – 3 basic questions to help you navigate the automation conundrum! Published on April 4, April 4, • .


Share this book
You might also like
Iron age societies in the Severn-Cotswolds

Iron age societies in the Severn-Cotswolds

An analysis of isothermal, bithermal, and thermomechanical fatigue data of Haynes 188 and B1900+Hf by energy considerations

An analysis of isothermal, bithermal, and thermomechanical fatigue data of Haynes 188 and B1900+Hf by energy considerations

Sexual happiness in marriage

Sexual happiness in marriage

New Rudmans questions and answers on the-- DAT dental admission test

New Rudmans questions and answers on the-- DAT dental admission test

Apache Trail, a national scenic byway

Apache Trail, a national scenic byway

Providing for the consideration of H.R. 6149

Providing for the consideration of H.R. 6149

The Magic World

The Magic World

Lessons in EKG interpretation

Lessons in EKG interpretation

Pocket solar energy information data bank

Pocket solar energy information data bank

Before I do

Before I do

Stripped Covers-Fapo-4.99

Stripped Covers-Fapo-4.99

Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents Download PDF EPUB FB2

Learning from Automation Surprises and ''Going Sour'' Accidents: Progress on Human-Centered Automation Learning from Automation Surprises and ''Going Sour'' Accidents: Progress on Human-Centered Automation between operators and the automation Are the problems just a series of small independent glitches revealed by specific accidents or.

Learning from Automation Surprises and “Going Sour” Accidents David D. Woods1 and Nadine B. Sarter2 1Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory Institute for Ergonomics The Ohio State University 2Institute of Aviation - Aviation Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign In N.

Sarter and R. Amalberti (Eds.)File Size: 75KB. Learning from Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents Several recent accidents involving automation surprises show this signature. • if the basics provide a coherent base that. The going sour scenario seems to be a side effect of complexity.

Research and incident data raise the concern that new technology, when developed in a technology-driven rather human-centered way, is increasing the operational complexity and increasing the potential for File Size: 1MB. Learning from Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents: Progress on Human-Centered Automation Article (PDF Available) February with Reads How we measure 'reads'.

Learning from automation surprises and "going sour" accidents: progress on human-centered automation: final report. Distancing through differencing: An obstacle to organizational learning following accidents; Essential characteristics of resilience; Essentials of resilience, revisited; Learning from Automation Surprises and “Going Sour” Accidents: Progress on Human-Centered Automation; Behind Human Error.

Part I: Frameworks and Models of Human-Automation Coordination and Collaboration. K.M. Corker, Cognitive Models and Control: Human and System Dynamics in Advanced Airspace Operations.

De Keyser, D. Javaux, Mental Workload and Cognitive Complexity. Hollnagel, Modeling the Orderliness of Human Action. Leroux, Cognitive Aspects of Automation. The second singularity describes what might happen when human expertise is not increasing very quickly and intelligent computers are rapidly getting more powerful: the point where the two curves.

Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. [Nadine B Sarter; René Amalberti;] deal with automation surprises --A cognitive engineering perspective on maintenance errors --Learning from automation surprises and "going sour" accidents A cognitive engineering perspective on maintenance errors -- Learning from automation surprises and.

surprised by the behavior of the automation asking questions like, what is it doing now, why did it do that, or what is it going to do next (Wiener, ). Thus, automation has created surprises for practitioners who are confronted with unpredictable and difficult to understand system behavior in File Size: 90KB.

SearchWorks Catalog Stanford Libraries. Plat, R. Amalberti, Experimental Crew Training to Deal With Automation Surprises.

Reason, A Cognitive Engineering Perspective on Maintenance Errors. D.D. Woods, N.B. Sarter, Learning From Automation Surprises and "Going.

Stanford Libraries' official online search tool for books, media, journals, databases, government documents and more. Learning from Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents: Progress on Human-Centered Automation; While Scott is not a member of a resilience engineering community, his book Seeing like a state has long been a staple of the cognitive systems engineering and Learning from Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents: Progress on.

"Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain presents an impressive insight into the state of the art in this burgeoning field, written by various influential figures.

Many of the critical issues are addressed in detail and in context, and useful case studies are incorporated in many of the chapters.

The popular media loves stories about “the singularity” — the point at which computers get smarter than people, achieve consciousness, and take over.

Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain Plat, R. Amalberti, Experimental Crew Training to Deal With Automation Surprises. Reason, A Cognitive Engineering Perspective on Maintenance Errors. D.D. Woods, N.B. Sarter, Learning From Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents.

DOI link for Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain. Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain book. Edited By Nadine B. Sarter, René Amalberti, Rene Amalberti, Nadine Sarter. Edition 1st Edition.

First Published eBook Published 1 September Cited by: M. Plat, R. Amalberti, Experimental Crew Training to Deal With Automation Surprises. Reason, A Cognitive Engineering Perspective on Maintenance Errors.

D.D. Woods, N.B. Sarter, Learning From Automation Surprises and "Going Sour" Accidents. This is where machine learning makes it case as the transformative force that will fuel artificial intelligence’s growth as an enabler of massive automation.

Before we go deep into the discussion, let’s help you differentiate among similar sounding and similar meaning terms. Current research investigates automation feedback design compared with a potential design solution that may increase pilot’s situation awareness of the Flight Mode Annunciators (FMAs) to reduce pilot workload and improve human-automation coordination.

The research tools include an Eye Tracker and B flight by: 2.Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents. In N. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Ed.), Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence by:   Summary: There are several things holding back our use of deep learning methods and chief among them is that they are complicated and hard.

Now there are three platforms that offer Automated Deep Learning (ADL) so simple that almost anyone can do it. There are several things holding back our use of deep learning methods and chief among them is that they are complicated and hard.